August 1, 2025
Have you ever had a brilliant software idea that could solve a real problem, but felt overwhelmed when it came to deciding which features to build first? You're not alone. Many non-technical founders struggle with this exact challenge, especially when developers start asking for detailed project scope and budget constraints become a reality.
The key to success lies in building a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) that focuses on what truly matters. This guide will walk you through a practical, step-by-step process to prioritize your MVP features effectively, even if you don't have a technical background.
Let's start by clearing up a common misconception about MVPs. Many people think an MVP means building the cheapest or most basic version of their product possible. This approach often leads to disappointment and wasted resources.
A real MVP is the smallest version of your product that accomplishes three important goals:
The goal isn't to launch as quickly as possible. The goal is to learn as quickly as possible so you can make informed decisions about your product's future.
Before you start thinking about features, you need to clearly define the problem you're solving. This becomes the foundation for every decision you'll make moving forward.
Understanding your core problem helps you stay focused and avoid building features that sound good but don't actually help your users. Here's what you need to identify:
Who is this for? Be specific about your target user. Instead of saying "small businesses," say "therapists who run solo practices."
What exactly is the pain point? Don't just describe what's missing. Describe the frustration, time waste, or cost that your user experiences.
How are they currently solving it? Understanding current solutions helps you see where you can improve and what habits you might need to change.
What is the opportunity if this problem is solved? Quantify the benefit. How much time, money, or stress could you save your users?
Example: You're building a scheduling tool for therapists. The core problem: "Therapists waste 5+ hours a week coordinating appointments manually via text or phone."
This problem statement becomes your anchor for all decisions that follow.
Every product idea is built on assumptions about user behavior, market needs, and business viability. Your job is to figure out which assumption is the riskiest - the one that could break your entire business model if it turns out to be wrong.
Identifying your riskiest assumption helps you focus your MVP on testing what matters most. This prevents you from building a perfect product that nobody wants.
Ask yourself these questions:
What must be true for this product to succeed? Think about user behavior, market conditions, and business model requirements.
What's something I'm not sure users will actually do? Focus on actions that require users to change their current habits or trust your solution.
In our therapist scheduling example: "Therapists will trust a tool to handle bookings without manual review."
This assumption about user behavior is critical to test because if therapists don't trust automated booking, the entire product fails.
Now it's time to get all your ideas out of your head. Write down every feature you've ever considered for your product. Don't worry about organization or feasibility at this stage.
This brainstorming phase helps ensure you don't miss important features and gives you a complete picture of your product vision. Remember, you're not committing to building everything on this list.
Example features for the therapist app:
Most founders stop here with a messy list of features. The next step is where the real work begins.
Raw feature lists are overwhelming and don't help you make decisions. You need a systematic way to evaluate and rank your features based on their importance and impact.
There are several proven frameworks you can use to bring structure to your feature prioritization process. Choose the one that feels most comfortable for your situation.
This method helps you categorize features into four clear buckets:
Must Have – Features that are core to solving the user's problem. Without these, your product doesn't work.
Should Have – Features that improve the user experience significantly but aren't absolutely critical for launch.
Could Have – Nice-to-have features that add polish or convenience but can easily wait.
Won't Have (for now) – Features you're deliberately choosing to delay or exclude from this version.
Example categorization:
This method helps you distinguish between genuine needs and feature noise.
If you want a more analytical approach, RICE scoring gives you numerical rankings for your features.
RICE stands for:
Use this formula:
(Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort = Score
You can estimate rough scores on a 1-5 scale even without technical knowledge. Focus on building the highest-scoring features first.
Instead of thinking about isolated features, think about the complete user experience from start to finish.
This approach ensures your MVP supports a complete workflow rather than just providing disconnected tools. Map out each step your user takes, then identify only the essential features needed to support that journey.
For the therapist app:
This forces you to prioritize by user flow, not feature wish lists.
Based on your prioritization work, it's time to draw a clear line between what goes into your MVP and what gets delayed for future versions.
Making these decisions upfront prevents scope creep and keeps your development focused and efficient. Be ruthless about what makes the cut.
Include features that:
Defer features that:
In our therapist scheduling example:
Remember, every feature you don't build upfront saves time and money while getting you user feedback sooner.
Once you've clearly defined your MVP scope, you're ready to move into development and testing.
The learning phase is just as important as the building phase. Your MVP is designed to generate insights about your users and validate your assumptions.
Here's how to approach this final step:
Every feature you didn't build in the MVP gives you more time to learn what users actually need.
Learning from others' mistakes can save you significant time and resources in your MVP development process.
These common pitfalls trip up many founders, but they're all avoidable with the right mindset and approach.
Mistake 1: Building for edge cases Focus on the 80% use case that most users will experience, not the 20% exception cases that rarely happen.
Mistake 2: Equating "simple" with "easy"
MVPs can still require significant effort to build well. The goal is clarity of purpose, not shortcuts in quality.
Mistake 3: Adding features just because users ask Look for patterns in user requests rather than responding to individual feedback. One user's request might not represent a real need.
Prioritizing MVP features isn't about cutting corners - it's about cutting distractions. As a non-technical founder, your superpower is understanding users and their problems clearly. Focus on that clarity, and you'll build products that truly matter.
Ready to turn your MVP plan into reality? TechDots specializes in helping non-technical founders build custom software that solves real problems. Let's discuss your project and create a development roadmap that makes sense for your business.
Techdots has helped 15+ founders transform their visions into market-ready AI products. Each started exactly where you are now - with an idea and the courage to act on it.
Techdots: Where Founder Vision Meets AI Reality
Book Meeting
